Where next?
Back to Treatment add-ons information
For most patients, having a routine cycle of proven fertility treatment is effective without using any treatment add-ons.
Our ratings indicate whether the evidence from studies shows that a treatment add-on is effective at improving treatment outcomes for someone undergoing fertility treatment. Our ratings do not tell you how much that treatment add-on improves your chances of having a baby – please discuss this with your clinic.
During a conventional IVF cycle, eggs are fertilised and allowed to develop in a special culture fluid inside an incubator. Intrauterine culture differs in that it allows the early stages of embryo development to take place within the patient’s womb.
As with conventional IVF, eggs and sperm are collected and prepared. The eggs are fertilised and placed in an intrauterine culture device, which is inserted into the patient’s womb.
The device stays in place for several hours during the initial stages of embryo development. When the device is removed, the embryos are put in an incubator until they are ready to be transferred back to the womb or frozen for use in future treatment.
Of note, the womb is not the place in the body where the embryo would normally develop at this stage so is only able to mimic the natural environment to some extent. Normally the embryo would be developing in the fallopian tube which connects the ovary to the womb.
Ratings for Intrauterine culture | |
---|---|
Rated grey for increasing the chances of having a baby for most fertility patients
Grey traffic light
|
We cannot rate the effectiveness of this add-on at for improving the chances of having a baby for most fertility patients as there is insufficient moderate/high quality evidence. |
There are five ratings that indicate whether a treatment add-on is effective at improving treatment outcomes for someone undergoing fertility treatment, according to the evidence from studies. To make it easier to understand the scientific evidence for each treatment add-on we have a range of symbols and colours for each rated add-on below.
On balance, findings from high quality evidence shows this add-on is effective at improving the treatment outcome.
On balance, it is not clear whether this add-on is effective at improving the treatment outcome. This is because there is conflicting moderate/high quality evidence – in some studies the add-on has been found to be effective, but in other studies it has not.
We cannot rate the effectiveness of this add-on at improving the treatment outcome as there is insufficient moderate/high quality evidence.
On balance, the findings from moderate/high quality evidence shows that this add-on has no effect on the treatment outcome.
There are potential safety concerns and/or, on balance, findings from moderate/high quality evidence shows that this add-on may reduce treatment effectiveness.
All treatment add-ons on our list will have a rating to indicate whether the evidence shows that the treatment add-on is effective at improving the chances of having a baby for most fertility patients. Some treatment add-ons on our list may also have additional ratings for specific treatment outcomes. For example, whether the evidence shows that the treatment add-on reduces miscarriage. There may also be further ratings for specific patient groups, for example whether the evidence shows that the treatment add-on is effective for those who are aged over 40. Please see the individual webpages for each treatment add-on for their ratings.
An agreement between the HFEA and other professional and patient bodies (the 19th October 2023 consensus statement) states that treatments that have no strong evidence of their safety and/or effectiveness should only be offered in a research setting. Patients should not be charged extra to take part in research, including clinical trials.
There’s currently no evidence to show that intrauterine culture is effective at improving your chances of having a baby. This is something you may wish to consider if you are offered intrauterine culture.
At the July 2023 Scientific and Clinical Advances Advisory Committee (SCAAC) meeting the Committee evaluated the evidence base for intrauterine culture. Minutes of this discussion and the evidence used to inform this discussion are available on the SCAAC webpage.
Intrauterine culture does not carry any additional known risks for the person undergoing fertility treatment or the child born as a result of fertility treatment. However, there is very little research available into these possible risks.
If you have any questions about the safety and risks, your clinic will be able to discuss whether a treatment add-on would be safe for you to use considering your specific medical history and circumstances.
The SCAAC have reviewed the following studies for intrauterine culture:
Blockeel 2009 | 10.1093/humrep/dep005 |
In vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) are established treatments that have been proven effective for most patients. Treatment add-ons are optional non-essential treatments that may be offered in addition to such proven fertility treatment. The HFEA provides information on add-ons that meet the following criteria:
It is important to keep in mind that for most patients, having a routine cycle of proven fertility treatment is effective without using any treatment add-ons. If you are paying directly for your own treatment, you may want to think about whether it might be more effective and/or affordable to pay for multiple routine proven treatment cycles, rather than spending large sums of money on a single treatment cycle with treatment add-ons that haven’t been proven to be effective at increasing the likelihood of you having a baby.
We aim to publish clear and reliable information about some of the treatment add-ons that don’t have enough evidence to show that they are effective at improving your chances of having a baby and other relevant treatment outcomes. This provides useful information to patients and allows them to question the use of add-ons.
Review date: 19 October 2025